Peter Karman wrote:
> FWIW, I wouldn't expect anyone to upgrade to Swish3 who didn't need 
> full UTF-8
> support, large (1M+) doc collections or incremental indexing. Swish-e 2.4.x
> isn't going anywhere.
>   
In this Internet age, I would think UTF8 support is standard fare, and 
incremental indexing should solve the problem of routine reindexing?




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.swish-e.org
http://lists.swish-e.org/listinfo/users