Thomas Dowling wrote on 6/2/07 8:35 AM:
> On 6/1/2007 6:27 PM, Jordan Hayes wrote:
>> Someone asked me today: why don't we just use Solr for this?
There are other threads in the archive about Lucene vs Swish-e. I expect the
Lucene pros/cons still apply to Solr.
> So, for example, I index about 135k records for electronic theses and
> dissertations in swish-e, but at some point in the future we'll index
> (and facet) ~10M journal articles with Solr.
Other engines to consider for large collections:
* http://www.rectangular.com/kinosearch/ (Perl)
* http://xapian.org/features.php (C++ with lots of language bindings)
Both do UTF-8, multi-million doc collections, full incremental indexing, and
many of the same search features Swish-e has.
Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . peter(at)not-real.peknet.com
Users mailing list
Received on Mon Jun 4 09:48:47 2007