On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:02:49AM +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> >I don't mind. Are you actually using that structure value? I mean if
> >you are setting it then you should know what it is.
> Yes, but as far as I understand the value is a bitmask, right?
> With this function you can get the value, add another bit to it and set it
> back, instead of storing the value somewhere else (to change & set it
Yes, I think so. That structure value has probably been in swish
since the beginning, and I always assumed nobody ever used it. ;)
> >Could I ask you to also supply patches for the *.pod and CHANGES.pod
> >files? The patch will set longer if I have to write the docs. ;)
> Sure, no problem.
> I'll do that tomorrow.
> >Swish::API probably needs to be updated, too, but Peter may
> >want to do that since there's a version on CPAN.
> >In a perfect world there would be tests for every feature, too.
> Well, in a perfect world all function names would be consistent and clear,
> and every function would have a nice docs.
> Too bad our world is not perfect.. =)
Yes, poking around the swish internals can be painful.
Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list:
Help with Swish-e:
Received on Tue Jan 30 14:15:30 2007