ok, so just to make sure i do this correctly, i will build two indexes 
with 2.4.4, the smaller test, and the full.

then, i will do -T INDEX_WORDS > a file for each and look at how the 
phrase (Corey Rich) is represented?

also, something in the back of my head is screaming "stemming" at me, but 
i am not sure why... maybe just a migraine.

Brad
---------------------
Brad Miele
VP Technology
IPNStock.com
866 476 7862 x902
bmiele@ipnstock.com

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Bill Moseley wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:01:56PM -0500, Brad Miele wrote:
>>
>> ok, i will start on some of this at some point. in the short term,
>> however, rolling back to 2.4.3 has fixed the problem and i am going to
>> push new indexes to my production servers. My question is now is, when i
>> roll the swish-e back from 2.4.4 to 2.4.3 on the production machines,
>> should i replace the perl stuff? I know i can't make use of Peter's SAS
>> stuff, but i am going to stick with SWISH::API in the short term anyway.
>
> Peter will have to answer this -- I'm not remembering any changes to
> the C interface, though, and thus the perl modules should be
> compatible.  Again, Peter will need to confirm.
>
>
>> bill, i will follow your suggestions below when i have some time to chase
>> this further, but it seems to be some version wonkiness.
>
> There were some changes to the search code -- but I'd really want to
> know first that the words were indexed and placed in the index before
> looking for problems in the search code.
>
> -- 
> Bill Moseley
> moseley@hank.org
>
> Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list:
>   http://swish-e.org/Discussion/
>
> Help with Swish-e:
>   http://swish-e.org/current/docs
>   swish-e@sunsite.berkeley.edu
>
>
>