if you're doing more testing, I'd suggest this:

1. set DEBUG_RANK as Bill suggests. As of 2.4.3, that's in rank.h

2. adjust the default bias range from 10 up to 100 (I think 10 was a random 
number to start with). You can set it in swish.h.


since you've read the FAQ, you'll know that this feature is highly experimental. 
I would try it with both RankSchemes as well, to see if that makes a difference. 
The bias is a bit of hack, since it just artificially increases the frequency of 
the word(s), and frequency has more/less effect depending on which RankScheme 
you use.



koszalekopalek scribbled on 6/8/05 1:25 PM:

> Bill Moseley wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:00:49AM -0700, koszalekopalek wrote:
>>
>>But same rank?  Maybe you need a larger bias?
> 
> 
> I thought 10 was as high as I could go:
> http://www.swish-e.org/docs/swish-config.html#metanamesrank
> 
> 
>>DEBUG_RANK when compiling swish (edit rank.c or pass it to configure)
>>and see the raw rank scores and how your meta bias is changing things.
>>
>>There's some info at
>>
>>  http://swish-e.org/devel/devel_docs/swish-faq.html#how_is_ranking_calculated_
> 
> 
> Been there, seen that ;-)
> 
> I do not have access to the server and my scripts
> now but will do more testing tomorrow,
> 
> Thanks,
> A.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Startuj z INTERIA.PL! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f186c 

-- 
Peter Karman  .  http://peknet.com/  .  peter(at)not-real.peknet.com