Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive

Re: lucene/plucene/clucene

From: John Paige <paige.john(at)not-real.gmail.com>
Date: Mon May 09 2005 - 18:09:27 GMT
Yes, I would be interested to hear comments as well..Does anyone have
any comparison results with Swish especially in context with indexing
size with Clucene?

Thanks,
John

On 5/9/05, Nick Vidal <nick@inf.ufrgs.br> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't like the idea of forcing users to install a VM to run Lucene or
> anything else, so I prefere Swish-e comparing these two.
> 
> However there is Clucene which is also written in C++. It promises, even
> thought it's quite a new development. The good thing is that it has
> incremental updating. So you might want to check this out
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/clucene/).
> 
> I would like to hear comments about Clucene vs. Swish-e. What are your
> thoughts?
> 
> Regards,
> Nick Vidal
> 
> *********************************************************************
> Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
> this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
> to a plain text message.
> *********************************************************************
>
Received on Mon May 9 11:09:28 2005