Skip to main content.
home | support | download

Back to List Archive

Re: index size

From: Peter Karman <peter(at)>
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 15:34:36 GMT
I'll have to defer to Bill, then. I thought the main reason for the increased 
file size in 2.4.3 was due to the CompressPositions option now defaulting to 'No'.

Василевский Сергей scribbled on 3/2/05 9:34 AM:
>>you might try setting CompressPositions to 'Yes'. That only 
>>works if you 
>>compiled with zlib.
> I use CompressPositions to 'Yes' and zlib intalled
> but after install and use ver 2.4.3 my indexes size increase from 3Gb to 5Gb.
> And use CompressPositions to 'Yes' does nothing.
> Pervios use ver 2.4.2.
> I use merge form some small temp indexes to end large index. 
>>I'll have to defer to Bill on FileInfoCompression.
>>Василевский Сергей scribbled on 3/2/05 3:28 AM:
>>>1. How about using "FileInfoCompression yes" in ver. 2.4.3?
>>>In doc write "** This directive is currently not supported **" !
>>>My sum index size more than 5 Gb!
>>>And I want reduce it.
>>>2. In addition. 
>>>Tell me what is max index size may be created?
>>only limited by your filesystem, I think.
>>Peter Karman  .  .  peter(at)

Peter Karman  .  .  peter(at)
Received on Wed Mar 2 07:34:37 2005