On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:45:17PM -0600, Peter Karman wrote:
> yeah, that's what I thought. I was wondering if that kind of feature 
> would be useful as part of the API itself (like the stat[0,1] could be 
> remembered in the object somehow and then compared internally at every 
> Search() or something, throwing an exception or SwishError ?).

I don't think swish should do it on its own.  Might reopen when you
don't want it to.

Might be nice to have a method to call to check if the index file(s)
were changed.

I'm also not sure how this all relates to Jose's incremental indexes.

-- 
Bill Moseley
moseley@hank.org

Unsubscribe from or help with the swish-e list: 
   http://swish-e.org/Discussion/

Help with Swish-e:
   http://swish-e.org/current/docs
   swish-e@sunsite.berkeley.edu