On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:39:20PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:33:26PM -0800, Scott Hepler wrote:
> > No, I was just wanting to log requests in their own file. I was looking
> > for info in the archive and happened to find this post, and didn't want to
> > patch each new version if the 'stock' code had the capability.
> The web logs have the requests, of course. But if you want to log
> separately then there is a callback called "request_fixup" you can
> set. It passes the request object (which is a CGI.pm object, IIRC)
> and the configuration hash. So you could use that for logging.
'request_fixup' sounds great -- I'll give it a try. My main problem with
parsing the Apache logs is determining what's been done already, especially
in the case of failed runs.
> I think that message you quoted was about also reporting on the
> outcome of the search, too. So that would mean you would need another
> hook later on in the script. That doesn't exist.
Yes, that message was about logging the search result, which I don't think
is necessary in this case.
System Administration and Security
Received on Wed Jan 5 18:25:22 2005