Well I finished re-indexing the whole thing. There is a lot of data out there.
I ran the same search and it came back with the same results
Warning: Failed to uncompress Property. zlib uncompress returned: -5. uncompressed size: 14899107 buf_len: 1243796
I have two indexes setup one for Stemming_en2 and this one works
And one for Metaphone this one does not work.
Do I need to break up the indexes into smaller one?
I am indexing simple text files they are less than 20K, but there is about 3 million them
Hope someone can help with this problem
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moseley
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 2:23 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [SWISH-E] Re: wondering why?
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:40:38AM -0400, Weir James K Contr
> ASC/ENOI wrote: > Are you using the same exact program for
> both indexing and
> > > searching? I ask because it looks like a data offset error.
> > > Another possibility is that you copied the index file but are
> > > using the wrong associated .prop file. Did you copy or move
> > > the index by chance?
> > I move the index file and .prop to another folder after I index it.
> > Just incase I need to use the search while indexing.. Ie a
> Temp folder, is
> > This not a good idea;that is moving the files?
> Swish-e does that for you. When indexing it writes to .temp
> files of the same name as the index and when done renames the
> files. It's not atomic so there's a slight chance that the
> someone could open the index right in the middle of the
> rename and open the old index and the new .prop file and fail.
> I suspect it's a tiny bit faster if create the index in a
> temporary directory and then rename the directories, but it
> still isn't atomic since two files are opened.
> > > You posted about this in early March. Bill Schell found an
> > > off-by-one error that was causing problems, but I'm not sure
> > > if that's related to your issue as I think that was only when
> > > not using HTML2|XML2|TXT2 parser (i.e. using the old system
> > > where the entire file is read into memory). You are using
> > > HTML* which will use libxml2.
> > I am only indexing TXT files, should I use some other
> parser for that?
> Yes, then you would be using the old system that reads the
> entire file into memory and could get hit by that off-by-one
> bug. The TXT2 parser reads and indexes in chunks.
> Bill Moseley
Received on Mon May 3 03:28:42 2004