Can I assume that if no one comes up with a good objection, that this
feature will be implemented in version 2.4.2 ?
thanks.
pek
Bill Moseley supposedly wrote on 02/09/2004 10:33 AM:
>
> So, it may be as easy as replacing that append_buffer() call above with:
>
> {
> flush_buffer( parse_data, 1 );
> parse_data->word_pos++;
> }
>
> If nobody can come up with a reason that it should't bumy the we don't
> need a config option.... ;)
>
--
Peter Karman - Software Publications Programmer - Cray Inc
phone: 651-605-9009 - mailto:karman@cray.com
Received on Tue Feb 10 09:04:35 2004