Thanks for the information.
What's strange is that libxml2 is installed (v2.5.10), but there's no xml2-cofig script in /usr/lib/ (or anywhere on the machine). I don't know why this is, and I've been upgrading RPMs all night trying to make that file appear, to no avail.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:33:22 -0800 (PST), Bill Moseley <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:43:22PM -0800, Deane Barker wrote:
> > How do I know if I have libxml2 in my installation?
> Here's one way:
> moseley@bumby:~$ ldd `which swish-e` | grep libxml
> libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x40024000)
> Here's another way:
> moseley@bumby:~/swish-e$ fgrep -i xml config.log
> configure:23859: checking for xml2-config
> configure:23877: found /usr/bin/xml2-config
> configure:23890: result: /usr/bin/xml2-config
> configure:23916: checking for libxml libraries >= 2.4.3
> LIBXML2_LIB='-L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lpthread -lm'
> And another:
> moseley@bumby:~/swish-e$ fgrep -i xml src/acconfig.h
> /* Libxml2 support included */
> #define HAVE_LIBXML2
> > "IndexContents HTML2 .html"
> > I get:
> > "Unknown document type 'HTML2'"
> That would make me think it wasn't linked with libxml2. The program
> xml2-config must be in your path when running the configure script.
> moseley@bumby:~/swish-e$ xml2-config --libs
> -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lpthread -lm
> > It's not capturing META and the BODY tag and such, and it's not
> > respecting the <!-- noindex --> tags.
> Yep, that happens in the parser.c code which is linked in when libxml2
> is available.
> > Perhaps I'm naive, but I thought that the compilation would detect
> > libxml2 and include it. Or did I have to configure something special
> > when I compiled?
> As above, you need to have xml2-config in your path for it to be
> Bill Moseley
Received on Tue Dec 9 03:14:56 2003