Hi Roy, Bill, Dave,
After reading your posts I would choose the LGPL option.
As you know, I have spent a lot of hours in SWISH-E, from the
earlier 2.0.x versions until now (I have spent all the weekend
in a new php module). Most of the time I worked just for
So, if LGPL give us 1000 users and GPL 999; I prefer LGPL.
On 21 May 2003 at 10:22, Roy Tennant wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 08:27:42AM -0700, Roy Tennant wrote:
> >> Having looked at the GPL license more closely
> >> <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php>, I tend to
> >> think it is too restrictive.
> > I have a strong desire for gin when I start reading licenses. What
> > did you find too restrictive.
> Really? I find I have an urge for single malt scotch, myself...
> What I'm finding too restrictive is the religious nature of the
> license. That is, it isn't enough that this specific application be
> open source, it must force every other application with which it comes
> into contact be open source as well. Frankly, I'd prefer that we
> create software that enables a lot of great things to happen, of all
> different stripes. But then, I've never been very religious so maybe
> it's just me.
> >> Alternatives that have been suggested include
> >> the "lite" version of GPL
> >> <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-license.php> and the BSD
> >> license <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php>.
> > Did you read: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html
> > I frankly do not clearly understand the details of the licenses and
> > the real difference between LGPL and GPL. Let me poke around a bit.
> The difference is that GPL forces any software that uses a GPL
> application to be open source as well. The LGPL, as well as other
> licenses, does not force such a thing. So what we need to decide is
> whether we want to force any application that uses SWISH-E into open
> source, and therefore limit the potential use and application of
> SWISH-E, or wether we don't want to so limit its use. It's telling to
> me that Stallman says that the key characteristic about whether to go
> with GPL or LGPL is whether or not there are competing applications
> available. That is, if there is another open source application that
> does about the same thing as yours, you should probably go with LGPL
> or else people will run, not walk, to the competing application due to
> a less restrictive license. If, however, your application is unique,
> you should use the GPL which will force applications that use it into
> open source.
> > How much money is left in the Swish-e.com legal budget, Roy?
> We have just as much left in that budget as we began with, you crazy
> nut...<grin> Roy
> > --
> > Bill Moseley
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Wed May 21 18:08:14 2003