Hi Bill,

I guess I would have assumed

-w 'keywords=(blah) and (not blah)'

but I certainly could agree that the parenless version is 
ambiguous.  However, whichever way it's parsed, 2.0.5 still shouldn't be 
bringing back any results, should it?

cheers,

David


At 00:13 02-04-01, Bill Moseley wrote:
>At 01:41 PM 04/01/01 -0700, David Wood wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >In an HMTL doc containing both <META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="blah"> and
> >the string 'blah' in the doc body, the following search:
> >
> >-w "keywords=blah and not blah" finds the doc in 2.0.5 but does not in 
> 1.3.2.
>
>Is that
>
>   -w 'keywords=(bla) and (not blah)'
>
>or
>   -w 'keywords=(bla and not blah)'
>
>
>
>Bill Moseley
>mailto:moseley@hank.org