Hi Bill,

I think this is also the way swish 1.3 works. 
Probably, it is working this way for historical reasons.
Should it be changed?

cu
Jose



On 27 Nov 2000, at 12:26, Bill Moseley wrote:

> Ok, last post.  (maybe not)
> 
> Just to be clear, I'm talking about indexing words like this:
> 
>    electrónicos
>    electrónicos
> 
> I think swish should index those the same (as electrónicos), but if
> any of "&#;" are not included in WordCharacters then you end up like
> this
> 
> -----> WORD INFO <-----
> 243: 1 1 9 1 2
> electr: 1 1 9 1 1
> exxlectrónicos: 1 1 9 1 4  <-- This indexed ok.
> nico: 1 1 9 1 3
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Moseley
> mailto:moseley@hank.org
>