Rich,

Thanks for the response. It is mostly an issue of support. We have
a very complex set of development tools spanning several operating
systems, platforms and target CPUs. We have a requirement for a
certain level of support and tracability etc. for any tools used for
commercial development and are not in a position to meet those
requirements for gcc.

Rgds,
Kenneth

rbf wrote:
> 
> Hi Kenneth-
> 
>  > I cannot understand how these basic violations could be present
> unless
>  > I am the only one in the world not using gcc !
> I'm afraid you are indeed the only person not using gcc.
> 
>  > In any case I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has
>  > struck these problems and has a solution, other than editting all
>  > of the violating source code to make it genuinely ANSI compatible.
> Why is it not a solution to install gcc on your equipment? It's
> pretty straightforward.
> 
> Rich
> 
> -- Rich Fuchs rbf@lyra.rlg.org (Research Libraries Group)

-- 
========================================================================
Kenneth Green                           +61 3 9210 5541 Tel. & Voicemail
R&D Project Manager                     +61 3 9210 5550 FAX
                                        kenneth_green@hp.com
Advanced Networks Division              PO Box 221, Blackburn Vic 3130
Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd           AUSTRALIA
========================================================================