On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Roy Tennant wrote:
> Let's be clear here. There is nothing "old" about SWISH-E. SWISH++ does
> not replace SWISH-E. It focuses on different problems than SWISH-E, and
> thus is a separate solution that may be appropriate in some instances and
> inappropriate in others.
Methinks you're being a tad sensitive. Remember, the author
does not have English as his native language. It was quite
clear to me that he meant old merely as "existed first."
Received on Mon Jun 22 22:58:11 1998