On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Roy Tennant wrote:

> Let's be clear here. There is nothing "old" about SWISH-E. SWISH++ does
> not replace SWISH-E. It focuses on different problems than SWISH-E, and
> thus is a separate solution that may be appropriate in some instances and
> inappropriate in others.

	Methinks you're being a tad sensitive.  Remember, the author
	does not have English as his native language.  It was quite
	clear to me that he meant old merely as "existed first."

	- Paul